For kernel maintainers, the idea is that these credentials would back the identities behind signed code: instead of relying solely on a PGP key signed at a conference years ago, maintainers could check a bundle of fresh credentials proving that the key they see belongs to the same person recognized by the Linux Foundation, their employer, or other trusted issuers. These credentials can be fed into transparency logs and other audit systems.
During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Mads Gade, CEO of Ineos Energy points to the huge pipes of the wellhead which, for decades, carried oil and gas up from below the seabed.。搜狗输入法2026对此有专业解读
Раскрыты подробности похищения ребенка в Смоленске09:27，这一点在同城约会中也有详细论述
🦞 OpenClaw macOS 安装与配置指南
人 民 网 版 权 所 有 ，未 经 书 面 授 权 禁 止 使 用，更多细节参见safew官方版本下载